Talk:E.ON

E.ON
"a European energy company based in Germany". Uh huh. British Gas? Daily Mirror Ltd? Equinox ◑ 14:50, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, let the non-dictionary projects handle the non-dictionary material. Also, get some rules to stop this sort of thing happening. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:01, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I would subject to WT:BRAND per WT:BP, in which case I believe it would fail. DAVilla 17:55, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow. delete. -- Prince Kassad 17:10, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * If I recall right, e.g. Mountain Dew has passed rfd, and we have lots of other brand names around. I know that every entry should be discussed on its own merits, but there should also be some logic. It shouldn't be a problem to find three quotations of E.ON if that's required. After all, it's one of the largest energy companies in the world. On the other hand I would like to delete this as well as every other company and brand name, with the exception of the few cases where the brand names have truly become to signify something else than themselves (like hoover). --Hekaheka 18:37, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, as the entry can host etymology and pronunciation. This rationale does not apply to "British Gas". --Dan Polansky 20:28, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * You don't think it's possible to transcribe "British Gas" in IPA, SAMPA or enPR? Mglovesfun (talk) 21:06, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * "British Gas" is a sum of parts with respect to pronunciation, I suppose: I can get the pronunciation from "British" and "gas". ("British Gas" is not a sum of parts with respect to semantics.) --Dan Polansky 07:29, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Vahag 16:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

deleted. -- Prince Kassad 17:25, 16 March 2011 (UTC)