Talk:Fahrradweg

RFD discussion: June 2022
Rfd-redundant. I think this word has only one sense. &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 23:38, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Do I get it you do not want the entry to be deleted, and also not to have any specific sense deleted, but instead to have the three senses merged into just one, such as simply ? --Lambiam 10:07, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes. If someone feels like there are three distinct senses to this word ( added the third one ) then they may object, but AFAICT they shouldn't be there. &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 10:24, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * So merge them. Surely this page is for suggesting an entire entry should be deleted, not just that it should be edited. —Mahāgaja · talk 11:02, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If that is the case, then we should get rid of rfd-redundant. &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 11:08, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * : rfd-redundant is fine when a specific sense is already covered by another sense and you just want to delete that sense. Otherwise, rfm is better. There's lots of overlap between sense-specific rfds and rfm, and the rfds often result in merging just to save time, but "I think this word has only one sense" is a little too blatantly an rfm issue. Chuck Entz (talk) 15:51, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay, thank you. Will use that in the future for this kind of issue. &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 22:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge. Unlike, which can also refer to a touristic cycling route, I think Fahrradweg always refers to a Sonderweg für Radfahrer, a stretch of road reserved for cyclists, excluding cars.

Speedily merged. &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 11:10, 25 June 2022 (UTC)