Talk:Gänseliesel

Someone with knowledge should enter this.

Gänseliesel
This is a famous landwark in Germany (Gänseliesel). Any citations would be appreciated. --Keene 17:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)


 * There are articles on it in English and German Wikipedias (Gänseliesel). —Stephen 19:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)


 * 1974: Psychological Research, published by EBSCO Publishing
 * Ich sehe etwas Schwarzes, es könnte die Gänseliesel sein.
 * (translation) I see something black, it looks like–perhaps the Gänseliesel. (response to a Rorschach ink blot test)
 * &mdash; Beobach972 19:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

&mdash; Beobach972 19:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 1979: Horst Schlötelburg, Briefe nach jenseits.
 * Weibern in die Schlüpfer faßt, der sollte hier nicht sitzen wie die Gänseliesel am Brunnen.


 * rfvpassed for German Cynewulf 19:23, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Gänseliesel
WF RFV'd it years ago, it passed. Now it's RFD time. --P5Nd2 (talk) 08:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Why? Being a proper noun can't be a reason; being a proper noun of a thing can't be either (else also e.g. Statue of Liberty would have to be deleted). Somewhat misleading header and missing inflection section can't be too (which would be a matter of WT:RFC). It could still be a matter of RFV though, requiring three cites for each gender. (If there are plenty of cites for feminine gender and just the one in the entry for neuter gender, than neuter gender isn't properly attested and could be an error.) -84.161.12.35 09:38, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep, no reason for deletion given. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 14:59, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, not sure why WF wants it in RFD anyway. Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 09:18, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Quick keep. Wf doesn't know either why it is in RFD. --P5Nd2 (talk) 13:54, 16 October 2017 (UTC)