Talk:GDP

RFD discussion: June 2021–November 2023
Not Chinese.--Tibidibi (talk) 20:48, 3 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Is it different from other members of Category:Chinese_terms_written_in_foreign_scripts ?
 * Leaning towards delete. Though it is commonly used in Chinese texts, it's not exactly Chinese. I guess the argument for phonetic adaptation is probably the only one that would support keeping. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 00:18, 25 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Are unadapted borrowings considered to not belong to the language into which they're borrowed? Think of how many one-for-one French terms are used in English to the same effect, albeit with Anglicised pronunciation, like how I guess is being done in this Chinese word. I don't know if it's Chinese, but if it's being used in Chinese writing, as opposed to a Chinese equivalent, isn't that enough to qualify it as being a Chinese word? I would personally keep this. Kiril kovachev (talk) 19:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Responding to the : I'll only comment that, surely, whatever happens to the Chinese entry should also happen to the Japanese one. 0DF (talk) 14:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Kept, no consensus. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 16:07, 1 November 2023 (UTC)