Talk:General Secretary

General Secretary
This is a really terrible entry that somehow slipped under the radar. I was about to stick an RFC on it when I realised that it might not even be entry-worthy in the first place, although if it is, two of the definitions need to go. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:39, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
 * What definitions? All I see is a list of facts about General Secretaries, which seem to be specific to Communist entities. This same text appears in the Wikipedia article, but not as numbered items. Chuck Entz (talk) 06:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, would probably be OK if the three explanations were replaced by an actual definition. SemperBlotto (talk) 07:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I've had a go at cleaning it up. Smurrayinchester (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep as reworded: secretary as head of a party is a novel sense; generally we think of secretaries as the people in the office typing stuff up. Pur ple back pack 89  15:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Kept as reworded. bd2412 T 19:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)