Talk:Gieschen

RFC discussion: September 2017–January 2018
I don't trust this entry. —suzukaze (t・c) 15:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)


 * At least etymology doesn't make much sense.
 * For a proper noun it's more likely that it derives directly from another proper noun, in this case it's more likely that English Gieschen derives from German *Gieschen or *Gießchen.
 * German Giess seems doubtful. Traditionally it would rather be *Gieß (as in, ) and even deformed it would be *Gieß (except Swiss which would have *Giess).
 * If the English comes from *Gießchen or *Gieß (Swiss *Giesschen, *Giess), it's more likely *Gießchen or *Giesschen than Gieschen.
 * But the trusting thing rather seems to be a matter of WT:RFV or WT:RFE. -84.161.20.16 15:32, 28 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The surname is real. The rest was a load of bullshit, which is now all removed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 07:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)