Talk:Google Chrome

Request for verification
Same. DCDuring TALK 01:59, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Add Opera: to the list. I'm afraid I created it purely because I was annoyed at Firefox having an entry :) Equinox ◑ 20:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm more sure that the 2-part names are uncitable than the one-part names under the attributive use standard for brand names. To me it matters not a wit whether a tradename is a placename, a demonym, a registered trademark, a corporate name, or a dba; or whether it is owned by a government, an NGO, or a private for-profit enterprise.
 * I also don't see why we have Category:Web browsers, which is entirely populated with items that need to meet the attributive-use standard and haven't. DCDuring TALK 22:59, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * It comes down to what people want to see, really. The same applies to the terms glossed wikijargon. They probably don't technically pass, but there are enough wiki fans (and Web browser fans) that questioning them seems futile. Sadly! Equinox ◑ 00:44, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The question is really whether these meet Criteria for inclusion/Brand names. It seems very unlikely to me. --Yair rand 07:06, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry deleted. —Ruakh TALK 21:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)