Talk:Google Doodle

RFV discussion: August–October 2017
Added by an IP editor. I doubt it can be found in many durably archived sources, and I assume this falls under WT:BRAND. — Vorziblix (talk · contribs) 16:06, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Don't know. But it is definitely real. SemperBlotto (talk) 16:09, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Paper newspapers and magazines are durably archived, so it shouldn't be hard to find the thing itself mentioned in CFI-compliant sources, but whether we can find WT:BRAND-compliant uses is another question. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 18:06, 11 August 2017 (UTC)


 * This was RFD-tagged and deleted before, so may have failed RFD in the past, before we had talk-page archives. Equinox ◑ 18:36, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Requests_for_deletion/Archives/2007/05 -- Pedrianaplant (talk) 22:24, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

This is cited. The question of WT:BRAND compliance belongs more properly under requests for deletion. Kiwima (talk) 01:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 04:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)