Talk:Googlenope

RFV
Journalist's invention. Nothing in Google Books and only one result on Usenet. Equinox ◑ 14:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * In Usenet terminology a nope was the opposite of a dupe: A dupe is an article arriving more than once, and a nope is an article arriving less than once (IOW it didn't arrive).  If the Googlenope didn't make it into common use it was at least a good try, no patent nonsense.  Of course good try wouldn't be the same as encyclopedic (or whatever wikt: considers as notable). –89.204.137.194 04:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I added it to WT:LOP. In the event it is cited and RFV-passed, it should be removed from the LOP. - -sche (discuss) 05:14, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

I created the entry, since I use this word and hear other people do. I like to add a link in online discussions for those that do not know it. --Jarekt 12:33, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 05:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)