Talk:Gramophone

Gramophone
"(obsolete) A brand of phonograph that introduced disk records." So it's the Gramophone Company? Ultimateria 00:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Might now be attestable in accordance with standards for company/brand names, because of genericized gramophone. DCDuring TALK 13:49, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I only know it as a classical music magazine. Would that be OK? SemperBlotto 13:56, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * That's still a brand. Maybe that sense would meet brand attestation in some context. DCDuring TALK 14:01, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, the Grammies are (or were) short for Gramophones Purplebackpack89  (Notes Taken) (Locker) 02:18, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

moved to RFV -- Liliana • 11:10, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

RFV discussion: April–October 2012
Rfv-sense: (obsolete) A brand of phonograph that introduced disk records. If it's what I think it is, it needs cites in accordance with WT:BRAND. -- Liliana • 11:09, 13 April 2012 (UTC)


 * This was originally a trademark, but I'm more used to seeing it in lower case in modern use. -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 19:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't see any capitalized uses that don't specify that the term is being used in relation to a product of a gramophone company. bd2412 T 01:31, 27 September 2012 (UTC)


 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 19:13, 1 October 2012 (UTC)