Talk:HAT-P-11

RFV discussion: January–February 2022
—Svārtava [t•c•u•r] 04:46, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * See Criteria_for_inclusion, which states that
 * "All systematic names of celestial objects, as well as celestial objects not listed above (including comets and manmade objects in space) shall be included if they have three citations of figurative use that fulfill attestation requirements, in the same manner as place names above".
 * There are certainly more than three uses on Google Scholar:, although we need three figurative uses. CFI states
 * "Figurative use refers to figurative language (e.g., simile, metaphor, metonymy) that makes reference to one or more of the place's characteristics. In the case of simile and metaphor, the definition should note the place's relevant characteristics."
 * (Just for policy reference.) 70.172.194.25 04:57, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, Google Scholar isn't exactly the first place I would turn to for figurative uses...
 * I guess we are looking for things like "it felt hotter than HAT-P-11 under the unforgiving desert sun", which we're pretty obviously not going to find. Or am I reading too much into the "figurative use" criterion? This, that and the other (talk) 15:11, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I don’t think your sample sentence actually shows a figurative use; it’s still referring directly to HAT-P-11 and comparing something to it. A figurative use would be something like (the extremely implausible) “the moon hung in the sky, a pale HAT-P-11 whose fate was forever tied with the Earth’s”. — SGconlaw (talk) 05:04, 8 January 2022 (UTC)


 * RFV-failed in the lack of figurative uses. —Svārtava [t•u•r] 12:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)