Talk:Hogvartensis

RFV discussion: March–July 2015
Needs to meet the fictional-universe part of CFI, but it looks like a clearcut case of a strictly in-universe term. This is modern Latin, so there should be three independent cites. Chuck Entz (talk) 23:09, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * In terms of rules, Latin isn't listed on Criteria for inclusion/Well documented languages. Renard Migrant (talk) 11:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)


 * In the past, we have (at least sometimes) required three quotations for modern Latin. See Talk:birotula for one such discussion. Maybe we should modify WT:WDL to reflect this. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 12:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * No objections from me! Renard Migrant (talk) 12:22, 21 March 2015 (UTC)


 * No-one provided any citations at all. RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 21:06, 7 July 2015 (UTC)