Talk:I'm pregnant

I&#39;m pregnant
Sum of parts. All the given translations are sum of parts as well - that's why they are all red links. SemperBlotto (talk) 07:05, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as valid phrasebook entry. It's the sort of thing a person might need to know how to say in an unfamiliar language when in a foreign country. If the translations are all red links, it's just because no one has made this phrasebook entry in the other languages yet. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 07:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Congratulations, Jeff! Equinox ◑ 13:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Meh, keep. Renard Migrant (talk) 13:41, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Thebuck093 (talk) 16:23, 25 April 2015 (UTC) Keep! Why not have this entry?

If we dedicate phrasebook entries their own namespace:
 * 1) we will never have to deal with rfd's on them.
 * 2) we can change the appearance of phrasebook entries. Now it feels like we are confined to the standard entry layout (ELE).
 * 3) we will never have to discuss this (migration) again xD
 * 4) we will have a bijection between lexical units and entries in the main namespace. Very cool thing I think.

If enough people agree with me we can talk about it in depth in a more appropriate place.--Dixtosa (talk) 16:35, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree. Furthermore they don't need to be accessible via the search function because people are unlikely to search for them. Renard Migrant (talk) 17:13, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I also agree to them being moved somewhere - anywhere (personally, I would delete the great majority of them - especially those that don't appear in any paper phrasebook). SemperBlotto (talk) 08:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

I support the removal of Phrasebook, preferably to where the pepper grows (see: missä pippuri kasvaa). --Hekaheka (talk) 04:23, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Abstain on this one. We held Votes/pl-2012-12/Removing phrasebook. I recall people mentioned tentative criteria for phrasebook entries: they had to be useful, simple, and common (high-frequency). Category:English phrasebook currently has 346 entries. I prefer to see truly useful phrasebook entries such as I'm hungry in the mainspace. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep; the phrase does appear in multiple phrasebooks as per . --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:42, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep if we have a phrasebook, this seems like an important phrase for it.--Prosfilaes (talk) 06:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * But we evidently don't have one. DCDuring TALK 06:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Keep the entry and keep the phrasebook. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 11:57, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Keep (both entry and phrasebook). Important medical-related phrase. --KoreanQuoter (talk) 02:30, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Keep the entry and keep the phrasebook (in the main namespace). It would be nice if those of you who do not appreciate the phrasebook could just tick a box in prefs to hide all phrasebook entries. —Stephen (Talk) 07:46, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

RFD kept per consensus: I count 8 keeps and 2 deletes. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:58, 9 May 2015 (UTC)