Talk:I agree

¶ I wish you could explain your last edit of that entry, Msh210. What is ‘usex’? --Pilcrow 18:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * A usage example: an example sentence that shows usage of the word. See [[Wiktionary:Glossary]]. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 18:20, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, please note that if I edit a page, I don't necessarily watch its talkpage; if you wish to contact me, my own usertalkpage is a better place. The same is, I think, true for most editors. (Now, however, I am watching this.) &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 18:22, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * ¶ This phrase has survived dozens of edits without having the example removed. Surely that is significant? However, it is not a major loss for me if we need to take the examples out of their phrase entries. --Pilcrow 18:36, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

I agree
Tagged but not listed. -- Liliana • 18:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: not phrasebookworthy. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 06:08, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 06:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Probably delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 08:49, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wiktionary does not seem to have enough folks willing to make a serious effort to formalize and support a phrasebook. DCDuring TALK 16:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, delete. (I would also delete most of the phrasebook entries, but some people like them). SemperBlotto 07:16, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Perfectly good phrasebook entry, common enough phrase. --Yair rand 07:21, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * So's this. So what? We are a dictionary, not a phrasebook. We have proven ourselves to not be interested in making a serious effort to host temporarily or permanently a phrasebook that users might be able to rely on. DCDuring TALK 16:20, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * There's no "we" as in "We have proven ourselves to not be interested [..]", only individual editors of Wiktionary with various interests and priorities. Wiktionary is a dictionary that has a phrasebook, as you know. You dislike the phrasebook, so much so that you have tried to create the impression in the past that there is very little community support for phrasebook in Wiktionary, contrary to facts discovered later. Furthermore, there's no serious effort to build up the Slovak section of English Wiktionary, but that alone is a poor reason to have Slovak terms deleted.
 * I don't know whether "I agree" is a good phrasebook entry, but is seems okay.
 * "I agree" was tagged for deletion by you (DCDuring) on 1 August 2011, in, without providing a reason. --Dan Polansky 17:54, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I have only seen "support" for a phrasebook in the following forms:
 * As a dumping ground for SoP expressions to resolve contentious RfD discussions. In this function it was an alternative to Appendix solutions.
 * As a warehouse pending the establishment of a some kind of effort to have a phrasebook that a user could rely on.
 * As a repository of puerile contributions that, at best, seemed more like translation practice than an effort to help users.
 * Purely idealistically. (ranging from "We need or ought to have a phrasebook" to "Wouldn't it be nice to have a phrasebook?")
 * What I haven't seen is any sustained effort. It reminds me of other grand projects. DCDuring TALK 20:14, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's just "I" + "agree". --Actarus (Prince d&#39;Euphor) 12:23, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 03:57, 19 October 2011 (UTC)