Talk:I am Canadian

I am Canadian
Do we need this for all ethnicities in the world? We have Appendix:I am (ethnicity) already. -- Liliana • 18:00, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the point (of having it) is that we're to have it for all anglophone ethnicities, not all ethnicities: see [[Appendix talk:I am (ethnicity)]]. (Somewhat relevant also is [[Appendix talk:I am (ethnicity)]].) &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 18:15, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep if we must have a bloody phrasebook. You're just showing one of the reasons why mixing this stuff with a general-purpose dictionary is very stupid indeed. Equinox ◑ 22:08, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, no added value. Wiktionary's mission is "every word in every language", not "every phrase". --Hekaheka 04:53, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - as above. SemperBlotto 07:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete but I suggest to keep at least one complete example - I am English, no offense to other nationalities/ethnicities. I chose "English" without any bias, perhaps because it's the English Wiktionary. The effort to replace "English" with anything else - "Canadian", "Mexican", etc. is minimum, although can also cause problems like using adjectives where a noun is required or incorrect ending or gender, etc. For example Polish uses instrumental case to make this phrase - Anglik -> Anglikiem, Angielka -> Angielką . --Anatoli 22:59, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. --Yair rand 16:02, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Maro 16:51, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Deleted. — Ungoliant (Falai) 19:39, 12 August 2012 (UTC)