Talk:I am not a lawyer

RFD discussion: November 2014
SOP. --WikiTiki89 23:01, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: Useful phrasebook entry, and source of an abbreviation. Pur ple back pack 89  23:04, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a phrasebook candidate. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 23:04, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Why not? We have lots of phrasebook entries with the form "I am..." or "I have..." Pur ple back pack 89   23:10, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The repetitiveness of phrases (which contradict the description of what should go in, a kind of phrasebook CFI) is one of the things that turn some editors away from the phrasebook project, even if they support the idea otherwise. IMHO, you're just making the case worse by adding such entries. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 23:18, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, no question. Equinox ◑ 00:19, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete and block creator for disruptive edits. — Keφr 08:49, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Eh, no. We're talking one entry here. Pur ple back <font color="#CC33CC">pack <font color="FFBB00">89   14:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Well of course, this is just one in a long series, but particularly symptomatic, I think. — Keφr 14:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * No, Kephir, this is just you disliking me again. If you look at the number of pages I've created this calender year that have been RfDed or successfully deleted, you'll find it's relatively few.  That's why there's community consensus not only to let me edit unabated, but community consensus to have me whitelisted. <font face="Verdana"><font color="#3A003A">Pur <font color="#800080">ple <font color="#991C99">back <font color="#CC33CC">pack <font color="FFBB00">89   14:19, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I would disagree with Kephir. Purpleback's improved a lot since his first edits, a block now based on edits made years ago wouldn't be justified. Is this edit flouting policy or just an edit many editors disagree with? I think more the second, and we need editors with different viewpoints to keep us all honest. Renard Migrant (talk) 14:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete --Hekaheka (talk) 11:07, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. The creator added an inaccurate definition to make it look idiomatic, but it’s not. — Ungoliant (falai) 11:14, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Ungoliant, the definition is accurate, and is written in the same manner as similar phrases. <font face="Verdana"><font color="#3A003A">Pur <font color="#800080">ple <font color="#991C99">back <font color="#CC33CC">pack <font color="FFBB00">89  14:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete DCDuring TALK 04:11, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Deleted. <i style="background:lightgreen">bd2412</i> T 17:46, 26 November 2014 (UTC)