Talk:I think, therefore I am

I think therefore I am
Along with all the translations. Seems like a Wikiquote/Wikipedia situation; it has cultural and philosophical relevance, but it isn't lexical, idiomatic, or worthy of keeping as a phrasebook entry. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I disagree that it's entirely unidiomatic, and the fact that it is snowcloned is evidence of lexical value. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 06:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * How about just putting into it? Many phrasebook entries are just SOP and not lexical or idiomatic, as e.g. do you have children or what's your phone number. -84.161.58.164 23:47, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Phrasebook entries are for things our readers would want to know how to say. How many people are going to worry about being unable to communicate this to someone who speaks another language? Chuck Entz (talk) 01:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

No consensus to delete. bd2412 T 23:04, 26 December 2017 (UTC)