Talk:IntelliSense

RFV discussion
Brand name of a product. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 18:43, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Not a physical product, so WT:BRAND does not apply. --Dan Polansky 11:14, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Intellisense may be distributed on tangible media. In any event, bits are physical. WT:BRAND does not say tangible. Furthermore, at sufficiently high voltage bits could be tangible. Therefore, WT:BRAND does apply. DCDuring TALK 12:04, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I added this a while ago. I can't remember why. I'd probably seen a load of other brand names and thought this one happened to sound nice. I agree it does need to pass WT:BRAND and think it's impossible that it will. Equinox ◑ 18:37, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I looked at my citations and they don't pass WT:BRAND so I've removed it. Equinox ◑ 00:20, 16 January 2011 (UTC)