Talk:Internet predator

RFD discussion: December 2016–January 2017
SoP, I think. The entry gives a sexual definition, but it can really be any predator on the Internet, e.g. (2005, Tom Antion, The ultimate guide to electronic marketing for small business) "To best serve your customers, you should know about Internet scams to help protect them from falling prey to financial Internet predators." Equinox ◑ 20:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * But there might be a language that needs this as a translation target. DCDuring TALK 21:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * There will always be a language. We'll soon have to add every conceivable sentence. Delete. --Hekaheka (talk) 22:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Unless someone presents specific examples of languages to support the translation target/translation hub rationale, I don't think this rationale can be sincerely applied. Above, it looks rather like sarcasm, an unpleasant form of communication all too often arousing negative emotions in the intended recipients, replacing strength of argument with something else, suggesting that strong argument is lacking. I hope these cheap shots at translation target/translation hub rationale will have no or little effect, but you never know. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:47, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Don't be silly, Dan; we would never use sarcasm to make fun of your non-CFI-based rationales for keeping entries. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * RFD failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)