Talk:J6er

RFV discussion: September 2022
Tagged but not listed by. The word has already been cited by using quotations from Twitter and other websites, but I suppose the current wording of WT:CFI implies that a web-cited term can be challenged, requiring a two-week-long discussion to decide its fate.

For the record, I did add two durably archived sources too, one of which is a mention and the other of which is a use (albeit a use in a disreputable far-right rag, but oh well). 98.170.164.88 08:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Make that two durably archived uses and a mention. 98.170.164.88 09:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I added a citation from The Post-Star. J3133 (talk) 09:50, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Added a quote from Usenet (well, an online article someone quoted on Usenet). This is clearly cited. Binarystep (talk) 11:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Under a strict reading this is not cited (and I feel that someone else will bring this up), per the clause at WT:ATTEST that citations counting for RFV must span over a year. However, to mitigate that, I've re-added the hot-word template, and as such, will mark this as RFV-passed. AG202 (talk) 02:51, 20 September 2022 (UTC)