Talk:JLPT

RFC discussion: April 2015
I'm a bit dubious about some of these translations. --Recónditos (talk) 09:02, 18 April 2015 (UTC)


 * It looks as though Atitarev entered most or all of the translations, and he is known to be very careful to get the correct translations. The ones that I can read looked quite reasonable to me, although I do not know what it is called officially in any of the languages. —Stephen (Talk) 09:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Officially, it's called "JLPT" in all languages, since that's the original and the official abbreviation. The translations are mostly transliterations (like "Microsoft" is normally referred to as "Майкрософт" in Russian but a Microsoft office in Russia may have only "Microsoft" sign) and what the exam is referred to be speakers. Which particular translation doesn't look right? Or all of them? Have you also checked the Wikipedia article on JLPT and interwikis? --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 15:12, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

RFC discussion: December 2017–April 2024
English. I think the long translations of the full name should go to Japanese-Language Proficiency Test, and JLPT should be reserved for equivalent acronyms in other languages. —suzukaze (t・c) 04:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Not clear that the longer form would meet CFI / survive RFD, therefore left as-is. - -sche (discuss) 18:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC)