Talk:Japono

RFV discussion: September 2017–April 2018
Rfv-sense "Japanese person" This is clearly used with this meaning online, but I'm not sure it can be cited. Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 09:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * "clearly used ... online" - then how about usenet or google groups (groups.google.com/forum/#!overview)? It's online too but treated as durably archived. -84.161.10.69 11:22, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, there's generally not a lot of Ido on Usenet, but there are in fact three attestations.   ←₰-→  Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  12:52, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * On closer inspection, it looks like all those quotations go back to the same person and the time span is just under a year. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  12:58, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

RFV discussion: February 2021–January 2022
Ido: “”. Tagged by Lingo Bingo Dingo on 18 September 2017 (Talk:Japono: “On closer inspection, it looks like all those quotations go back to the same person and the time span is just under a year.”) 07:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Just a note that this RFV has already been resolved. Might want to strike out the title. Razorflame 19:08, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * As there are no cites and the sense has not been removed it is not resolved. J3133 (talk) 19:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * This is not a thing. Ido apocopics are a closed class reserved mostly for pronouns and particles. Audrey (talk) 22:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. Ultimateria (talk) 22:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)