Talk:Kančendženga

Quality of the further reading
I placed "Jméno třetí nejvyšší hory světa, Naše řeč (2009)" into the further reading since the source is not free from reports of observable linguistic facts. However, the opening and some other parts of that source exemplify unscientific spirit and have no place in any linguistic journal aspiring to report facts and nothing but facts. The presence of the source in the Further reading section should not be construed as my endorsement of the objectionable passages. (Goes without saying, but anyway.) --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)