Talk:Kirindy Mitea

RFD discussion: May–June 2021
Not dictionary material. Imetsia (talk) 18:00, 8 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Why not? Seems to be a place name, not a company or brand or anything. Equinox ◑ 02:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * We shouldn't have an entry for every national park, government building, public statue, bus stop, street corner, etc. Users can look to maps, not a dictionary, for that information. This is not even an especially popular national park and fails our new CFI for place names (at least by my reading). Imetsia (talk) 17:26, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. It fulfils CFI for place names, I'm sure other national parks are included. DonnanZ (talk) 09:10, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Under which heading — "geological landforms and regions?" I don't interpret that category so broadly as to include national parks, but other editors might see it differently. It seems somewhat unnatural for a national park to be called a "geological region," especially when its limits are not decided by geological features (e.g. and cf. elevation for hills and mountains, landscape/sandiness for deserts, fault lines for tectonic plates, etc.). Imetsia (talk) 17:26, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I would call national parks geographical regions, which are much larger than a street corner. Other entries including national parks include, , and more than likely others.  also qualifies for an entry, funnily enough. DonnanZ (talk) 19:48, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Good point. Keep. It's harmless. DAVilla 15:07, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * RFD-kept. Imetsia (talk) 16:55, 8 June 2021 (UTC)