Talk:Lehrer-Schwa

RFV discussion: August 2018–April 2019
Only Google Books search results I get which give 0 usages: Only Google Groups results I get which give 0 usages: -84.161.35.100 11:15, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 * (as maskuline "der Lehrer-Schwa")
 * (a low-quality English-German dictionary)
 * (a mentioning in » «)
 * -> quoting unsourced de.wp article de:w:Fast offener Zentralvokal
 * I haven’t ever heard this either. I’d classify it as private language of some phonetics teachers and give here my vote for its Deletion already. Fay Freak (talk) 11:49, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The German Wiktionary has in its lemma a-Schwa the example, actually a quotation, „Sie würde allerdings als Vokal a-Schwa bzw. Lehrer-Schwa notiert.“ The given link is dead but archived here. This is course material from a 2003 proseminar at the Institut für Phonetik und Sprachliche Kommunikation of the University of Munich, not just some "private language". --Lambiam 22:48, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The text has "Sie würde allerdings als Vokal "a-Schwa" bzw. "Lehrer-Schwa" notiert.", i.e. it has quotation marks and de.wikt is misquoting it. The example "[e] ['le:.re] Lehrer:  am Wortende wird als sog. a-Schwa realisiert" is misquoted too, and in a way which makes the quote nonsense. Original has: "[ɐ] ['le:.rɐ] Le̱hrer:  am Wortende wird als sog. a-Schwa realisiert". -84.161.27.99 04:15, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Private language of an institute is still private language. Korn &#91;kʰũːɘ̃n&#93; (talk) 20:52, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * No citations provided, confusing. Delete. – Jberkel 13:27, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 14:49, 11 April 2019 (UTC)