Talk:Mewtwo

RFV discussion: September 2011–March 2012
Moved from an older RFD discussion (June 2011) per vague consensus. Note it's also a trademark so should potentially have to meet WT:BRAND. Here is an abbreviated summary of some RFD comments (but please see the whole conversation rather than rely on this): "Creature from fictional universe. Like having an entry for Xann, protagonist of 1980s video game Terminus, or Dumbledore, wizard from Harry Potter." (Equinox); "We do have Charizard and Pikachu cited, though." (Daniel Carrero); "Yeah, RFV" (Msh210); "It's common practice, but perhaps erroneously. Something which is not dictionary material can still be attested" (Mglovesfun). Equinox ◑ 20:02, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * FWIW WT:BRAND says "A brand name for a physical product should be included if it has entered the lexicon." A Mewtwo isn't a physical project. Mglovesfun (talk) 07:26, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Appendicize the lot of them. This !vote goes for all Pokemon below also. bd2412 T
 * Appendicize them under Appendix:Pokémon. ~ Robin 00:11, 19 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Moved to Appendix:Pokémon/Mewtwo, Appendix:Pokémon/Charizard, Appendix:Pokémon/Meowth. - -sche (discuss) 22:42, 3 March 2012 (UTC)