Talk:Millennial nexus

Millennial nexus
Sum of parts. Bad caps. Plural is wrong. SemperBlotto 19:10, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Doesn't seem vaguely sum of parts. No idea for the caps. Have changed the plural. Would this pass an RFV? Mglovesfun (talk) 13:25, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I should also have said that the definition ("A reference point in history that is observed by all humanity.") seems wrong. How can anything be observed by all humanity? (rural Chinese?, the Inuit?, undiscovered South American indians?) SemperBlotto 22:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Well of course something doesn't have to actually exist to have a word for it (e.g. teleport) but I'll look into it, it does look like some sort of joke, but I assume you would have speedily deleted in that case, and you haven't. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:47, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Having looked into it, oddly, I agree with everything you said! Neither of the books listed in the references seem to use the term, I have found one use in a pdf and one on a web forum. Bad caps either way; one uses Millennial Nexus Generation (not Millennial Nnexus) and one uses millennial nexus. It does seem sum of parts though what the meaning of nexus is is still beyond me, but nexus comes up other times in the text. Also definition is totally, totally wrong. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:28, 19 December 2011 (UTC)