Talk:Mollywood

RFV discussion: November 2015–April 2017
Rfv-sense "Mormon film industry";, I know it's real but I see a lot of mentions and few (if any) unambiguous uses. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:45, 30 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I agree that they are mostly mentions, but some move more into the use territory, and the 2012 cite is definitely a use:
 * Kiwima (talk) 04:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Kiwima (talk) 04:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Kiwima (talk) 04:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Kiwima (talk) 04:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Kiwima (talk) 04:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Kiwima (talk) 04:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure mention is strictly forbidden. CFI requires citations "conveying meaning" which could conceivably include mentions, provided they aren't "made-up examples of how a word might be used". Although all but the first citation might fall under that, the strongest cases are the 2013 and the two 2007 quotes, with the term nearly appearing as an appositive. I mean, how would we feel about the example given in CFI if it were slightly modified?
 * They raised a small sail forward of the mainsail (the jib) in order to get the most out of the light wind.
 * Is this substantially different from the one explicitly allowed? DAVilla 06:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Usages in brackets are still usages, but the 2013 quote has single quotations with it (books.google). The cites with quotation marks IMHO are just mentionings, but see also Shiaphilia, its version history and the talk page. As for the cite with "nicknamed Mollywood", I'm unsure about it, but I'd tend to "mentioning". The 2012 cite of Elisha McIntyre is a usage. If it is RFV failed, then the term could be added to Appendix:List of protologisms/G-P. -Ikiaika (talk) 08:08, 15 July 2016 (UTC)


 * OK, this has been hanging around for over a year. I went back and found two more quotes that I think are clearly uses rather than mentions. I am calling this cited Kiwima (talk) 03:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)