Talk:Nedtran

RFD discussion: April 2016
Does this make any sense to anyone? Should the "definition" actually be the etymology? I just can't get to grips with it. SemperBlotto (talk) 19:55, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I just put it out of its misery as "no usable content given". The language was given as English with a "Filipino" descendant, it had an empty etymology section followed by a proper noun section with a definition that couldn't decide whether it was an etymology or a definition, and didn't really make sense as either. Judging by the name of the account that created it, I would say it was just someone trying to get their name in a dictionary who has no clue about how dictionaries work. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:07, 3 April 2016 (UTC)


 * RFD speedy deleted by Chuck Entz. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:46, 17 April 2016 (UTC)