Talk:Nihilartikel

RfD discussion.
Moved to RFD from RFV, but I'm not exactly sure why. Keep? --Connel MacKenzie 18:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


 * From earlier discussion:
 * This neologism originated as a hoax on the German Wikipedia. It has never been observed before and can be found only in mirrors and copies of, and references to the Wikipedia articles, with only a few non-notable exceptions. The English Wikipedia entry for Nihilartikel has been changed accordigly, most content of the old article has been moved to Fictitious entry. See the discussion on w:en:Talk:Fictitious entry. Cacycle 02:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Wasn't certain about this one. I had thought keeping the English meant keeping the German, but now I'm not sure that's true, as long as it's noted in the etymology of nihilartikel. Defer to de:Nihilartikel. DAVilla 15:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Kept. --Connel MacKenzie 19:59, 7 July 2007 (UTC)