Talk:Null Object pattern

Looks like a noun to me. And shouldn't it be null object pattern: - we don't use Wikipedia-like capitalization do we? SemperBlotto (talk) 09:00, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

RFD discussion: January–May 2023
SOP: +  sense 1.10 (which I just added). This, that and the other (talk) 01:28, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete – Jberkel 00:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Capitalisation is also wrong. Equinox ◑ 00:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Is also used in architecture and design as suggested by its labels?  is labelled as only applying to category theory and computer programming. &mdash; excarnateSojourner (talk &middot; contrib) 23:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Lol, no. The entry is a mess and needs a coup de grâce. – Jberkel 23:27, 5 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete as SoP. &mdash; excarnateSojourner (talk &middot; contrib) 14:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Deleted. - TheDaveRoss  14:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC)