Talk:Offizier

RFV discussion: May–June 2017
Rfv-sense, the chess piece. An IP address has expressed concern that this may not be a valid term, and tried to remove it, so could someone please verify this? PseudoSkull (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2017 (UTC) As it isn't obvious by the above: The entry now has four citations (which are durably archived and convey the meaning). -84.161.13.81 16:02, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Duden has the same definition, but there is no mention of it in the German Wikipedia article on "Schach". SemperBlotto (talk) 15:03, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * This book and this book are using the term with the intended meaning. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 15:50, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Easily cited - but maybe not by Angr's examples as the books discuss some chess variants like Courierspiel, Märchenschach, Vier-Personen-Schach. -84.161.16.196 00:04, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 18:13, 27 June 2017 (UTC)