Talk:Olive Oyl

RFV discussion: November 2011–February 2012
Fictional character. Needs to meet WT:FICTION and possibly (since it's a trademark used for various products and media) WT:BRAND. Equinox ◑ 18:41, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * How about this: "she's an Olive Oyl-on-coke type, looks to be about 5'll and 55 lbs" ? Fugyoo 22:46, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * You guys really suck. You demand a lot of time fiddly around formatting citations without giving any hint as to whether they will be acceptable or just a waste of time. Fugyoo 11:35, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * How is this a word or an idiom in a language? Move to RFD if it passes. --Mglovesfun (talk) 11:39, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * For fucks sake what kind of cunts are running this dictionary Fugyoo 11:48, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * You shitbags come along and REQUEST citations, so I waste my time going around looking for them, don't get any feedback on which ones might be acceptable, and then you want it delete it regardless or citations or not. Fucking pricks. If it can't be cited anyway just fucking delete it, morons. Fugyoo 11:51, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Are you asking to be blocked?
 * Please see WT:FICTION and WT:ATTEST. DCDuring TALK 12:57, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * An individual user requested citations. I, a different individual user, am questioning how this can meet CFI as a word or an idiom in a language. --Mglovesfun (talk) 13:22, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * It seems like at least one of you people should be able to answer my goddamn question then (the suggested citation) Fugyoo 16:29, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * To me it seems to be just mentioning the character (like "he had a Robert Smith hairstyle"). But we've got John Lennon glasses so who the hell knows really. The current definition is just naming a single specific character from fiction, so I don't think it belongs in a dictionary but an encyclopaedia. Equinox ◑ 12:21, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Has been deleted. - -sche (discuss) 05:33, 13 February 2012 (UTC)