Talk:P/N

P/N
An abbreviation for part number. Is this is a correctly formatted heading, or does PN suffice? And anyways, shouldn't it be P.N.? Jonathan Webley 13:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I've seen it as P/N. I cleaned up the format, using POS: Initialism (not sure that is correct since it has a slash).  I'd keep it. RJFJR 15:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I saw a few examples of P/N today in a warehouse at work. Seems common enough.--Dmol 14:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Although I object to an entry in the main namespace with a "/" in the entry title, this certainly seems to be in widespread use (with the slash.) --Connel MacKenzie 06:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

RFV passed. I feel weird about RFV-passing a word without cites, but this really is in very widespread use — especially since Dmol (in Ireland) and Connel MacKenzie and I (in the States) are all familiar with it. —RuakhTALK 04:52, 31 May 2007 (UTC)