Talk:POCCNR

RFV discussion
Moved from WT:RFD.

POCCNR was deleted with a "nah!", which seems very dismissive, since citations were given! A simple search shows this usage in English: ; so why was this deleted without even a discussion? 64.229.103.44 07:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note that we do not consider websites valid references. However, the term could still pass, based on Usenet cites, so I have restored it for this discussion. -- Prince Kassad 07:37, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

-- Prince Kassad 07:38, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks really unlikely. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:18, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah; there's a handful of hits that say (with the N and R reversed) afterwards, which doesn't really make it English. uses it in running text, but I don't know if that's the right usage.--Prosfilaes 23:44, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Another big question here will be that once it has cites, are those cites just people being lazy as I often am with my accents in Spanish? I might type anomalo: but that doesn't make it synonymous with anómalo:.  Typo vs. usage type of distinction. -  11:42, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * No one (well, essentially no one) writing English text sticks in Russian words with Latin letters crudely substituted for the Cyrillic, unless perhaps there's really no English word for the referent he has in mind (which there obviously is for Russia). So POCCNR, if used (as opposed to mentioned), is not a crude-substitution-of-Latin Russian word (which you, TDR, called "being lazy"), but an English word. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 19:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)


 * "POCCNR Freakin' Christmas Deer! // Well, I don't have Cyrillic loaded into my computer." and "when the free air/free accomodation-to-POCCNR (sry no cryllic keyboard!)" were the first and third usages found in blogs search. Seeing as there are only about 5 usages between blogs and groups that is a reasonably high percentage which are typos. -  21:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Very well. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 21:14, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry moved redirectlessly to Citations:POCCNR. —Ruakh TALK 19:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)