Talk:Pakistan-administered Kashmir

Indian-held Kashmir
As above.--Dmol (talk) 04:22, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * This one (unlike "Indian-annexed Kashmir") is well-attested. Did you mean to RFD it? - -sche (discuss) 04:49, 9 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: "above" referred to WT:RFV, which I had commented was unattested. But "Indian-held Kashmir" is trivially citable. The problem is simply that it is SOP: it is that portion of Kashmir which is held by India, rather than be Pakistan (or China). Hence, I have moved it here. - -sche (discuss) 10:05, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Indian-controlled Kashmir
As above. If nothing else, they are all SoP. --Dmol (talk) 04:22, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * This one (unlike "Indian-annexed Kashmir") is well-attested. Did you mean to RFD it? - -sche (discuss) 04:48, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * PS, see also Pakistan-administered Kashmir. - -sche (discuss) 05:32, 9 December 2013 (UTC)


 * SOP. (Delete.) - -sche (discuss) 10:05, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Indian-occupied Kashmir
Another one. SoP. --Dmol (talk) 04:34, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * This one (unlike "Indian-annexed Kashmir") is well-attested. Did you mean to RFD it? - -sche (discuss) 04:49, 9 December 2013 (UTC)


 * SOP. (Delete.) - -sche (discuss) 10:05, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Pakistan-administered Kashmir
SOP: this refers to the portion of Kashmir which is administered by Pakistan. The entry doesn't even try to obfuscate that; the definition is "the part of the Kashmir region controlled by the Islamic Republic of Pakistan". - -sche (discuss) 10:05, 9 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete all (and any other entries in the form of Country-[verb indicating status] Region). bd2412 T 13:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * This is no doubt the same contributor who created a bunch of Pakistan-themed entries in late August- the IP is different, but the editing is identical. Someone needs to look through their edits, because the concepts behind the entry names and the definitions tend to be loaded with a jingoistic Pakistani/islamacist POV. I deleted or massively edited some of their entries because they contained all kinds of territorial claims that no one outside of Pakistan accepts (for instance, listing divisions of Bangladesh as part of Pakistan, even though Bangladesh gained its independence 40 years ago, and they had an entry for a Chechen rebel state that only exists as a figment of a rebel leader's public pronouncement), and they toned things down a bit after I explained NPOV to them, but someone needs to do some research about the actual status of the territories and divisions they describe. India and Pakistan are right on the edge of war over the status of Kashmir, so any little detail is bound to have significance. Chuck Entz (talk) 15:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all, and any more that are found. I could easily create an entry for "British-occupied Ireland" and find a dozen cites for it, but that, like the other entries, is Sum of Parts.--Dmol (talk) 23:51, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 06:14, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete the four nominated "* Kashmir" entries: Indian-held Kashmir, Indian-controlled Kashmir, Indian-occupied Kashmir, and Pakistan-administered Kashmir. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:49, 15 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 02:01, 26 December 2013 (UTC)