Talk:Perubya

RFV discussion: March–April 2020
I have not identified a Tagalog dictionary or any Tagalog language sources that uses this term. I don't see a point of adding terms like Perubya here that are virtually non-existent in Tagalog language sources themselves. Stricnina (talk) 23:34, 19 March 2020 (UTC)


 * I've moved it to RfV, as this is a question of the word's existence.--Prosfilaes (talk) 10:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I posed it like a question, but I was pretty sure that "Perubya" is never used in Tagalog. But just to be sure, I looked again online and no Tagalog-language material using "Perubya" as a word appeared during my search. It's safe to say that "Perubya" is not worth a Wiktionary entry. Stricnina (talk) 13:40, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The point is, whether or not a word is actually used does not belong on RfD; it is a question for RfV, this page, where it will be left a month for someone to cite it. It's possible there's enough rare, archaic or niche sources using this word that it will be kept; words that have three attestations (for Tagalog) can be kept, even if they are virtually non-existent; see WT:ATTEST.--Prosfilaes (talk) 17:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * May I know what would be the next procedure after it is left for a month? Stricnina (talk) 08:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)


 * RFV-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:50, 21 April 2020 (UTC)