Talk:Positive

RFC discussion: undefined NaN–undefined NaN
- needs formatting - Paul G 16:40, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC) Where was this taken from? Looks like Websters, but is it a copyright violation? — Paul G 16:40, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC) I have attempted to initiate this process; the page was an absolute mess. Some of the content has been temporarily relocated to the Discussion page and the senses have been reordered to better reflect common usage. The latter will necessitate reordering of the Finnish analogues. Continuation will proceed later. Velociped 17:18, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)