Talk:Pr

RFC discussion: April 2014
This is a Translingual term with a usex in English, but the template requires a language code- resulting in the template adding the entry to the non-existent Category:Translation requests (Translingual). Chuck Entz (talk) 01:19, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * So just don't use, or use since the usex is English even though the term is translingual? - -sche (discuss) 01:33, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I endorse both of -sche's solutions, but also suggest a third: remove the usex and possibly make it part of the definition. --WikiTiki89 07:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I prefer because translingual is defined to be "many languages". --kc_kennylau (talk) 07:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * What if we change line 55 of Module:usex to ? --kc_kennylau (talk) 03:38, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * No, "Translingual" is not a language, so you can't have a usage example in "Translingual". --WikiTiki89 03:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC)