Talk:Regelbasisableger

RFV discussion: January–March 2022
German. Couple of mentions in sources that explain what a palindrome is. One use here: However, this can be said to not support WT:ATTEST because it doesn't convey meaning (practically any noun could be filled into that sentence; it's also just a singular sentence without context in a bullet list of sentences). as the creator. &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 17:05, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The sentence comes from a book of riddles, where each riddle presents a list of sentences and the problem is to find what they have in common. The sentences in this list have in common that they all contain a palindrome word; this particular one even two. It is artificial and should not count for attestation purposes. --Lambiam 15:55, January 27, 2022 (UTC)


 * Separate to attestability, the definition currently at 🇨🇬 is "control base scion", which imparts no useful meaning to me whatsoever. The fact that the German term is a palindrome isn't terribly useful, but even that is much more useful than the definition.
 * Even should we keep this entry, it needs an overhaul. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 00:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, the "control base scion". I'm not sure if this was intended as a joke, but better kept at WT:BJ. Anyway, it has had its time (15 years!). – Jberkel 00:34, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

RFV-failed. Added to WT:-) . &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 10:09, 3 March 2022 (UTC)