Talk:Sahsisk

RFV discussion: December 2017–January 2018
Didn't get any (relevant) google books results for it including inflected forms except this old mentioning of sahsisk and this preview mentioning of *sahsisc. Is it a reconstruction, normalisation and/or English-style miscapitalisation? -91.6.207.72 06:12, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Unattested in any spelling variant and not sure if it should be capitalized if it were. Anyway, I can find no certain indication that this was their endonym. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 18:54, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

RFV failed. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 08:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC)