Talk:Seaxisc

RFD discussion: March 2022
Old English. The word isn't attested. The Bosworth-Toller has no entry for it, except for a ghost entry linking to Suþseaxisc; the Middle English compendium gives the etymology of Middle English Saxish as "OE -seaxisc, -sexisc, in Sūþ-seaxisc," confirming that Seaxisc doesn't appear on its own in Old English. I've made a page for the reconstruction. Hundwine (talk) 07:41, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep, send to WT:RFVN. --Astova (talk) 21:32, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete the duplicate entry., you could have simply moved the entry to the reconstruction namespace. And in case you’re wondering, unilateral action by a user (active in the language) is fine. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  15:54, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , could you speedy this duplicate entry? Thanks. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  13:33, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅; I merged it into the reconstruction page to preserve the history. - -sche (discuss) 03:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

RFV discussion: March–April 2022
Old English. I'm pretty sure the word isn't attested. The Bosworth-Toller has no entry for it, except for a ghost entry linking to Suþseaxisc; the Middle English compendium gives the etymology of Middle English Saxish as "OE -seaxisc, -sexisc, in Sūþ-seaxisc," confirming that Seaxisc doesn't appear on its own in Old English. I've made a page for the reconstruction. Hundwine (talk) 05:21, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

RFV-resolved - page deleted This, that and the other (talk) 09:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)