Talk:Sinitic language

RFD discussion: September–October 2018
SOP, we have no Indo-European language, Sino-Tibetan language, Uralic language or Germanic language for instance. S URJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 14:09, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per utramque cavernam 14:14, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep But we have got Romance language, no? Qhwans (talk) 14:23, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Maybe we shouldn't, but then again, Romance is more ambiguous (due to ) than Sinitic is. S URJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 14:20, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, SoP, just like Afroasiatic language, Bantu language, Cariban language, ..., Zaparoan language. This should equally apply to . --Lambiam 16:27, 13 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete as SoP: also misdefined: one singular Sinitic language is not "a branch..." Equinox ◑ 19:50, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * More like a twig then? Helenpaws (talk) 20:25, 13 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 04:47, 14 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Well, according to the definition given, it is not Sinitic + language since currently Sinitic is defined as "Relating to the group of Chinese languages", and mentions nothing about "a branch of the Sino-Tibetan language family..." ---&#62; Tooironic (talk) 10:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * As mentioned by, the definition at Sinitic language is slightly erroneous. Perhaps the definition at Sinitic can be tweaked to mention the Sino-Tibetan language family. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 12:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Robbie SWE (talk) 06:33, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Abstain. I would like to keep it but can't figure out which card to play. It could be the Talk:free variable case, but that is not sure. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:28, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination—this phrase is formed the same way as equivalent phrases for other language families. —Granger (talk · contribs) 23:51, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Deleted. — SGconlaw (talk) 18:49, 20 October 2018 (UTC)