Talk:South Florida

RFD discussion: January–February 2017
Tagged by Tooironic in March, 2016, never listed here. I vote keep because it is not just a geographical description, but an identifier for a unique environmental and cultural region. Also, idiomatic in that there are some uses of the phrase that define as "South Florida" parts of the state that are north of parts that are not "South Florida". bd2412 T 22:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC)


 * I will go along with that. Wikipedia article found and added to the entry. DonnanZ (talk) 10:38, 9 January 2017 (UTC)


 * isn't it strange how we say south Florida, but southern California? why the inconsistency with states? i'd say keep. 99.101.56.68 21:15, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. There was an identical RFD for North Queensland which ended up being kept, despite not being an official region. --Dmol (talk) 02:12, 10 January 2017 (UTC)


 * RFD passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)