Talk:Struldbrug

RFV discussion: March 2021
Needs usage that meets WT:FICTION. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Such usage exists:, , . The definition needs some loosening, though; it is good enough for similes, as in the last of these uses, but not for metaphorical use as when addressing an obelisk as “forlorn Struldbrug”. So we need a change that results in the extension of the loosened concept overlapping with but not including all of the denotations of the pre-loosened concept. --Lambiam 15:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

RFV-resolved. Passed as amended. Kiwima (talk) 07:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)