Talk:Teaberry coffee

teaberry coffee
Am i misinformed that this exists separate from the botanical species teaberry? Qlarry (talk) 17:15, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't think it exists at all. See peaberry. Chuck Entz (talk) 00:33, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

RFV discussion: May–June 2018
Any takers? Probably needs to be moved to lowercase if OK. SemperBlotto (talk) 18:20, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * No hits on Books or Groups for this definition, I suspect because it's an error for peaberry (teaberry is another name for wintergreen). I would just delete it, because we already have peaberry, and peaberry coffee would be SOP. Chuck Entz (talk) 23:31, 6 May 2018 (UTC)


 * I am not so sure. I added two cites to the citations page. It looks like it might be a brand name (which would still not make it a valid word) Kiwima (talk) 01:25, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I was aware of those, but they don't have anything in common with the challenged sense except the name and the fact that they're obviously some kind of coffee. The challenged definition is very specific about what differentiates this kind of coffee from other kinds, and none of that is even hinted at by the cites. Given that the challenged definition makes it a very close synonym to peaberry, I don't see any reason to doubt my original assessment. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

RV-failed Kiwima (talk) 21:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)