Talk:Terittituniš

RFC discussion: May 2017
This is supposedly a Hayasan word, but is defined using an English template. I don't know the code for Hayasan. I don't know if the little squiggle on the final letter is correct. SemperBlotto (talk) 15:31, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Searching the language data modules for Hayasan yields no results. — Eru·tuon 15:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The language of the (Hittite?) DTLHS (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll send it to RfV and see what happens. SemperBlotto (talk) 15:44, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

RFV discussion: May 2017
Any takers? (not sure what the language is) SemperBlotto (talk) 15:45, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeeeeeeeah, I'm less and less excited about this user's contributions. — JohnC5 15:59, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Also, the majority of the content is non-dictionary material. — JohnC5 16:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * This is the theonym attested in Hittite. See . Unless someone can move this to a Hittite entry in the native script, it should be deleted. : cleaning after you is annoying. --Vahag (talk) 17:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Das Reich Urartu (Volkert Haas), page 24, gives the transcription Dte-ri-it-ti-tu-u-ni-a[š]?, while a 1937 article in Indogermanische Forschungen and this paper by A Petrosyan prefer Dte-ri-it-ti-tu-u-ni-i[š]. That is  or 𒀸 (-aš) respectively. If no-one has a reason to prefer -aš, I would go with -iš since I find various other works rendering the final vowel as i. The first part is usually analysed as . The second part is sometimes connected to the word for "tail" mentioned above, or . - -sche (discuss) 19:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your research. Could you either move or remove the entry? — JohnC5 19:20, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. - -sche (discuss) 20:13, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Finally, the user gave us something we can actually use. Kinda, sorta. —CodeCat 20:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Resolved. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:48, 8 May 2017 (UTC)