Talk:Ton

RFV discussion: November 2021–January 2022
Removed by IP out of process in Special:Diff/64669014 with the summary "Does not exist!" &mdash; surjection &lang; &rang; 14:49, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * It's from, from . Because of the , the term or at least etymology seem indeed very dubious.
 * From the same user: & . --Myrelia (talk) 21:56, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * It's at least archaic (note also that they provided the genitive, which - outside of fixed expressions and names - occurs in very few dialects overall and in none in Bern). For comparison, the standard High Alemannic word is with  being a possibility in some dialects (including some Highest Alemannic). The first consonant seems weird though.
 * See also these edits by, though she might just have copied over the information found in . --Fytcha (talk) 02:37, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I still got nothing. Asked somebody from Bern, they had no idea either. Not in my common sources either.
 * Any source perchance? &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 04:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Not in any of my dictionaries. And round here, everyone says . Ƿidsiþ 07:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

RFV-failed. &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 12:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)