Talk:Transformer

RFD discussion: April–August 2017
WT:FICTION. Equinox ◑ 22:00, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Jesus, already? I bet anyone here could find three citations from sources that have nothing to do with the Transformers franchise. This is like . If I could find citations for that, we can certainly find citations for this. Did you even bother to look? PseudoSkull (talk) 22:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Plus this isn't even an RFD thing. It's an RFV thing. PseudoSkull (talk) 22:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)


 * It's your entry. You cite it. Children's toys fail WT:FICTION even if it's your favourite. Equinox ◑ 00:26, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Then do Beyblade too because no one has opposed it thus far except you. And Transformers is not just a favorite toy of one person, but an extremely popular franchise that has been mentioned throughout books and the media. PseudoSkull (talk) 01:10, 15 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Easily attested, at this capitalization. E.g., 2015, Steve Berry, The Patriot Threat: A Novel, p. 304: “It's like a Transformer today,” Stamm said. “It appears as one thing, then becomes another.” bd2412 T 02:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * * However, I don't think we need separate senses for the toy and the character. The character is just an animated version of the toy. bd2412 T 02:35, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * As above, keep! PseudoSkull (talk) 02:42, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but how is that sense any different from the senses found at transformer? Delete if you ask me. --Robbie SWE (talk) 19:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Because the toy is rather specific, and others refer to the toy in many sources external from the franchise. PseudoSkull (talk) 19:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * We certainly don't have a sense at transformer of a mundane appearing object, usually a vehicle, capable of turning into a giant robot. bd2412 T 01:25, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Kept. 2-0-2. No consensus to delete. PseudoSkull (talk) 19:15, 13 August 2017 (UTC)