Talk:Vader

Request for verification
Rfv-sense: " A Sith surname", under WT:CFI. (The other sense of Vader is probably okay.) &#x200b;—  msh210  ℠  22:56, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * How is the other sense probably okay? It should be attested to the standard of a specific entity, if not a brand name. —Michael Z. 2009-08-13 23:41 z 
 * I suspect it's attested to the standard of a fictional-universe word, and think that that's all that's necessary. &#x200b;—  msh210  ℠  21:28, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


 * It's not attested with any quotations at all. I doubt that it could meet the requirement at WT:CFI to be suitable for inclusion in the dictionary.  I'm adding an RFD tag to this sense. —Michael Z. 2009-09-01 10:45 z 


 * Move to RFD? Mglovesfun (talk) 21:00, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Why? We're seeking attestation. &#x200b;—  msh210  ℠  21:28, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

See also. —Michael Z. 2009-09-01 11:48 z 

RFV failed x2, entire entry deleted. —Ruakh TALK 13:46, 22 November 2009 (UTC)